Gun Control: Arguments For and Against

Gun Control: Arguments For and Against Introduction There is a variety of acquiring a weapon within a state. Several claims allow anyone who lawfully owns a firearm to transport it openly, in public areas, without necessitating a permit or permit. A number of states likewise have no permit need to transport a concealed firearm. Concealed carry takes a permit generally in most states, however the most those states offer the permits automatically to any legal firearm owners who would like them. Areas also range in their guidelines on gun ownership in specific adjustments, like campuses and properties of worship. There is absolutely no consensus. Actually, police have the same varieties of social and local divides as everybody else. Generally, big-city police force chiefs will support firearm control, and small-town chiefs and sheriffs will oppose it. Those in the Northeast are much more likely than those in the South and Western world to favor it. Description Having the ability to replace ammunition videos quickly also increases the fatality tolls in mass shootings. Present state legislation requires semi-automatic rifles be prepared with a set magazine that will require a tool because of its removal. That little ingenuity satisfies regulations but thwarts the purpose of the locked-clip need. While state legislations takes a firearms seller to file an archive of sales with their state when a weapon changes hands, no such need is present for ammunition which, in simple fact, can be sold to just about anybody. (People barred from running a weapon are also barred from buying bullets, but thats hard to enforce because no record check is conducted). A preexisting regulation that was to have settled this matter for handgun ammunition is at risk of their state Supreme Court docket after a lesser judge ruled its meaning of ammunition was too obscure. In the meantime, Senate Pro-Tem Kevin de Leon has suggested amending regulations to clarify this is, but an examination by the Senate Community Basic safety Committee found the changes wouldnt solve the issues found by the judge. [1] The Argument Every time there are a shooting in the news headlines, right-wing pundits and politicians pull out their talking factors to make clear why the latest firearm tragedy doesnt indicate the U.S. should shrink access to lethal firearms. Guns dont kill people. People kill people This is an excellent argument for many who cant inform the difference between one fatality and twelve. Absolutely, a murderer could kill one individual or two with a blade before being discontinued. But to essentially rack up those mind-blowing fatality counts to make certain that lots of lives are ruined and young families ruined in the area of five or ten minutes you desire a gun. If whatever you value is apportioning blame and declaring that someone will or doesnt have murderous intention, then you should, claim a blade and a weapon are equivalent weaponry. For those individuals who tend to be worried about stopping unnecessary fatalities than simply acknowledging the hate that resides in a few peoples hearts, however, the absolute amount of harm a firearm can do is reason to limit who is able to get their practical one. The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun If you like pithy sayings to hard research, I can understand why this might be convincing. But if you go through the real world, viewers definitely not being our only anticipation, good individuals with weapons are scarcely any help in any way. No mass shootings before 30 years have been discontinued by an equipped civilian; in 1982, an equipped civilian successfully wiped out a shooter, but it was only after he determined his crime. It isnt that there arent enough weapons, either. You will discover as many weapons as people in this country, and completely a third of men and women are armed. Even though shootings happen in gun-happy places, where equipped people will definitely be nearby, this vigilante situation simply fails. But, mental health Opponents of weapon control love mentioning the condition of insufficient mental healthcare after a filming. This is firmly for deflection purposes, as there is absolutely no sign that Republicans will ever before work on significant reform for our mental health systems which, its true are woefully insufficient. Its a concern that only issues to them in the immediate aftermath of your taking then its neglected, until theres another taking pictures. [2] Wrong Arguments The Country wide Rifle Association and its own allies have their post-shooting workout down frigid. They wait around a day or two and then act in response with a blistering selection of disorders against gun-safety advocates getting in touch with for reform. No real matter what the circumstances a couple at a Xmas get together, a deranged teen at a cinema, or a sniper concentrating on cops at a peaceful demo they make the same tips, which, unsurprisingly, often seem detached from the realities. A good guy with a gun would have stopped it Most armed individuals fare more serious than their law enforcement counterparts. The clear style that emerges from weapon incidents is the fact that shooters have an individual link with their concentrate on locations some grudge against them, no subject how misguided. So when shooters choose a location at random, there is absolutely no substantive research that they gravitate specifically to gun-free areas. Even the most heart-wrenching works of gun assault are actually so typical and daily habit that writing a well-timed article about the topic has become extremely difficult. One mass filming replaces another, permitting short amount of time for meaningful representation or catharsis. While information regarding the tragedy in Dallas remain emerging, some fact is painfully clear: The shooter was apparently equipped with high-powered weaponry, was evidently undeterred by good men with guns and even specifically targeted those good individuals. Just as before, our countrys lax firearm regulations helped a thief unleash horrific carnage. [3] There is absolutely no uncertainty that the life of some 260 million weapons (which perhaps 60 million are handguns) escalates the death count in this country. We dont have driven-by poisonings or drive-by knifings, but we do have driven-by shootings. Quick access to weapons makes deadly assault more prevalent in drug offers, gang battles and street area brawls. However, there is absolutely no way to extinguish this way to obtain guns. It might be constitutionally suspect and politically impossible to confiscate vast sums of weapons. You are able to declare a location gun-free, as Virginia Technology got done, and weapons its still helped bring there. If you want to suppose by how much the U.S. murder rate would fall season if civilians got no guns, we have to start by recognizing that the non-gun homicide rate in this country is 3 x greater than the non-gun homicide rate in Britain. For historical and ethnic reasons, People in America are a far more violent people than the British, even when they cannot use a firearm. This fact models a floor below that your murder rate will not be reduced even if, by some constitutional or politics magic, we became gun-free. You can find federally required criminal background checks on purchasing weaponry; many claims (including Virginia) limit weapon purchases to 1 per month, and juveniles may well not buy them by any means. But even if there have been even tougher limitations, access to weapons would remain not too difficult. Not minimal because, as holds true today, many would be taken as well as others would be obtained through straw acquisitions created by a ready confederate. It really is practically impossible to utilize new history check or waiting-period regulations to avoid dangerous individuals from getting guns. The ones that they cannot buy, theyll steal or acquire. Its also important to note that weapons play an important role in self-defense. Estimations differ concerning how common this is, however the numbers arent trivial. Somewhere within 100,000 plus more than 2 million instances of self-defense occur each year. There are various compelling cases. In a single Mississippi senior high school, an equipped administrator apprehended an institution shooter. In the Pennsylvania senior high school, an armed product owner prevented further fatalities. Would an equipped teacher have averted a few of the fatalities at Virginia Technical? We cannot know, but it isnt unlikely. For the Western disdain for our legal culture, a lot of those countries shouldnt spend a lot of time congratulating themselves. In 2000, the pace at which individuals were robbed or assaulted was higher in Britain, Scotland, Finland, Poland, Denmark and Sweden than it was in America. The assault rate in Great Britain was double that in America. In the 10 years since England restricted all private ownership of handguns, the BBC reported that the amount of gun crimes has truly gone up sharply. A number of the worst types of mass gun assault have also took place in Europe. Lately, 17 students and professors were killed with a shooter in a single event at a German open public college; 14 legislators were taken to fatality in Switzerland, and eight city council users were taken to loss of life near Paris. The primary lesson which should emerge from the Virginia Technology killings is that people need to work harder to recognize and handle dangerously unpredictable personalities. It really is problems for Europeans as well as People in America, one that there are no easy alternatives such as transferring more firearm control laws and regulations. [4] Gun control wont protect us There are several facts and reports people use to claim both attributes of the weapon control issue. We are able to use other countries as illustrations and we may use criminal offenses rates of metropolitan areas, expresses and countries. No matter how carefully researched the figures are, individuals have an emotional a reaction to this problem that more often than not overrides the reports presented, apart from that one: The violent offense rate in America has truly gone down substantially within the last twenty years. Our anxieties, though, have risen, due to high-profile occurrences of mass killings of individuals found unaware. Killers took lives in churches, academic institutions, hospitals, government complexes, and the website of any marathon, the Twin Towers and a good part of any military bottom part where military were regarded as unarmed. [5] These killings identify the actual fact that anybody, and some of our family members, are susceptible when caught with this shield down against someone else who would like to do injury. Does it subject what tool they used? If it was a rifle, a tube bomb, a pickup truck of fertilizer, a pressure cooker or a planes the outcome is the same. Yet an incredible number of other people possess the freedom to get those exact same things and can never utilize them to get rid of. These horrific mass killings were dedicated by an extremely small number of men and women who want to harm and eliminate others. Ultimately, inside our horror, we provide them with a voice they might never have got otherwise. Just access a deadly tool doesnt switch someone into a killer. Most of us who have vehicles have felt some type of extreme anger at other individuals because we feel they have got put us in harms way. Even special ops men, military and law enforcement officials who are trained to get rid of for respectable purposes, who are aware of multiple weapons and also have usage of the weaponry and ammunition even these individuals, who are experienced, will let you know they never know if indeed they can take the lead to until positioned able to use deadly drive to protect someone else. My federal has proven that it is unable to protect me against people who wish to wipe out. And I dont blame the federal government, because there is merely one person at fault here: The person or girl who made a decision to kill. [5] Automobiles are tools that is involved with as much deaths as weapons. With this country, we give liberty and take it away once you end up being unworthy of the flexibility weve given you. No one suggests removing cars or going right through a power supply of tests to find out if you may be a drunk drivers 1 day. Understandably, we wish a remedy to ensure that people and our family members will never maintain the situation to be trapped unaware by a person who thought we would do offense. Mass killers have targeted churches, businesses, concert halls, schools and private hospitals, nonetheless they could as easily take their assault to a location where people are equipped. Yet they dont. Even at Fort Hood, the killer opt for place on the bottom where he recognized military would be unarmed. And what we have to do is find the courage to simply accept that from the dawn of energy before day man no more walks the planet earth, evil will see a means. Murder is little or nothing new, it isnt going away which is not reliant on one technique of eliminating or another. We are able to forge ahead realizing that while bad is in our midst, it includes the few. The nice, responsible people will be the vast majority. We are able to trust the other person with basic freedoms until one individual shows to be untrustworthy by maliciously, intentionally harming another individual. [5] Misunderstanding about gun control There are so many misunderstandings that it is hard to learn where to start. For one, we have to understand that weve experienced an amazing reduction in violent criminal offenses and gun criminal offense in the U.S. because the early on 1990s, even although amount of firearms has increased by about 10 million each year. There is no simple correspondence between your volume of firearms in private hands and the quantity of gun criminal offense, and I often think it is somewhat peculiar that there appears to be a notion that things are more serious than ever before when, the truth is, things are actually better than they are for many years. People also needs to remember that most gun-related fatalities are suicides, not murders. You will discover doubly many suicides in the U.S. by weapons as there are homicides and I believe most people discover that very surprising. Again and again one reads that 30,000 individuals have been wiped out with weapons, but whats not said is the fact 20,000 of these needed their own lives. But perhaps the most frequent misperception of most, and the idea I wish to underline over and over is that there surely is no simple, effective insurance policy to reduce firearm crime that is merely there for the requesting so long as weve the politics will to do it. That solution doesnt are present. Its very difficult to find an effort that is implementable and enforceable that could make almost any a direct effect on gun offense. [6] The Term ‘Gun Control’  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   ‘Weapon control’ is a wide term that addresses any kind of limitation on what varieties of firearms can be sold and bought, who is able to own or sell them, where and exactly how they could be stored or taken, what tasks a seller must vet a buyer, and what commitments both buyer and owner have to survey transactions to the federal government. Sometimes, the word is also used to protect related concerns, like restrictions on types of ammunition and newspapers, or technology, like the sort that allows weapons to fire only once gripped by their owners. Lately, weapon control debates have centered mainly on criminal background checks for clients, allowing visitors to carry weapons in public areas, and whether to permit the ownership of assault rifles. [7] Conclusion Weve slipped into a land of administration that has guaranteed the moon, hardly ever delivered and powered us into an environment of more laws and regulations, more federal, and less liberty and none of them of this has quit murder, pain and anguish. No government provides the utopia many seek. I am hoping our people keep tight to the idea that we dont need to be considered a fear-ridden country centered on restrictions, but instead that we continue to be the land of the free and home of the fearless. References Californias proposed gun laws wont change our culture of violence, but they will make us safer. (n.d.). Retrieved April 12, 2017, from http://www.latimes.com/opinion/editorials/la-ed-adv-california-guns-20160422-story.html Marcotte, A. (2015, October 1). 4 pro-gun arguments we’re sick of hearing. Rolling Stone. Retrieved from http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/4-pro-gun-arguments-were-sick-of-hearing-20151001 DeFillipis, E., & Hughes, D. (2016). 5 arguments against gun control—and why they are all wrong. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-defilippis-hughes-gun-myths-debunked-20160708-snap-story.html Wilson, J. Q. (2007, April 20). Gun control isn’t the answer. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from http://www.latimes.com/la-oe-wilson20apr20-story.html Kyle, T. (2013, July 18). ‘American Sniper’ widow: Gun control won’t protect us. CNN. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/07/opinions/taya-kyle-gun-control Davidson, J. (2015, December 1). A criminologist’s case against gun control. Time. Retrieved from http://www.time.com/4100408/a-criminologists-case-against-gun-control Perez-Pena, R. (2015, October 7). Gun control explained. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/10/07/us/gun-control-explained.html?_r=0

Steven King :: essays research papers

Stephen King often called; â€Å"Master of Horror† is a well-known author for his horror stories, and science fiction novels. He had many influences on how has written his books. King has also faced many hardships within his life.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  King was born in Portland, Maine on September 21, 1947 to Nellie Ruth King and Donald Edwin King at the Maine General Hospital. Stephen was the only natural born child in the family, as his brother David was adopted at birth in 1945.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  The Kings were your average family until one night when his father Donald said he was going out for a pack of cigarettes, and never returned home. Stephen at the time was only three years old. His father had a large collection of science fiction novels in which Stephen read growing up. By the time Stephen was seven years old, he wrote his first short story. He also was a fan of the 50’s horror movies, which inspired him to write in the science fiction field. Stephen’s stories were also influenced by the nineteenth century gothic tradition, especially the writings of Edgar Allan Poe. King as a teenager, joined the football team, played in a rock band, yet still had two of his short stories published.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  King started his actually writing career in January of 1959 when he and his brother David decided to publish their own local newspaper. So David bought a mimeograph and they called their paper Dave’s Rag, and it sold for 5 cents and issue.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  King attended high school in Lisbon, Maine at Lisbon High School in 1962. Him and his best friend Chris Chesley published a collection of 18 short stories called People, Places, and Things-Volume I. A year later King and Gaslight Books published a two part book titled â€Å"The Star Invaders.†   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  King made his first published appearance in 1965. His story, â€Å"I Was a Teenage Grave Robber†, which was only about 6000 words in length. The story was published in a magazine named Comics Review.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  In 1966, King graduated from high school and took his scholarship from the University of Maine at Orono. He received a bachelor’s degree in English and a certificate to teach high school in June 1970. He then married Tabitha Jane Spruce on January 2, 1971.King accepted a teaching job at Hampden Academy as an English teacher, and so they moved to Hermon.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  King started to write and submit novels to publishing companies, but had not luck.

Of mice and men is the story of two men George Milton and Lennie Small Essay

Of mice and men is the story of two men George Milton and Lennie Small who are two people who move from place to place in search of work. This is so that one day they can afford to buy a small farm somewhere where they can live alone and be there own bosses. George looks after Lennie because Lennie is mentally slow and he has looked after him since Lennie’s aunt died, because Lennie is mentally challenged, he tends to get George and himself into trouble because of stupid little things. They where on the run and they found a ranch in the Salinas valley California where they could work as ranch hands. Crooks, the black stable buck, was a proud aloof man who kept his distance from other people and demanded that they keep their own distance too. This was because he was black and at the time this novel was written, there was a lot of racist discrimination towards people with black skin, and so if he did mix with the others they would just make a mockery of him by using sarcasm and taunts. Crooks was obviously a very intelligent person because he controlled his inner anger towards the other people on the ranch but he was also a proud and bitter man. Proud because he never let anyone see how he truly felt and the ridicule and name calling and bitter because of the way he is treated and he passes on the hurt feeling he has to other people he thinks that there will be no recriminations from. He feels he is isolated because he is the only black man on the ranch and one of the very few black people in the entire area. Crooks is treated badly due to the racism in both the ranch and society as a whole. At the time when this story was written, the world was a very racist place and anyone with a different coloured skin other than white was treated differently. He was called a nigger and yet he was born in America so in fact, he was a true American and not a nigger, but due to him being black, he was treated very differently. He was given all the jobs that a white man would like to consider below him, i.e. cleaning out the stables. Even though the workers on the ranch did not set out to insult him deliberately, the use of the term ‘nigger’ signals to people that black men like Crooks were degraded both verbally and physically by people with white skin. Crooks was openly referred to as a ‘nigger’, which amplifies the casual racism that was directed at him by the others. Crooks bullies Lennie because he has been tormented and bullied all the time he has been able to understand the facts of racial prejudice. He is then given the chance to bully Lennie. To get Lennie’s attention he uses a subdued and convincing voice. When he gets the affect he wants he then turns to bullying and you can see his â€Å"face lighted with pleasure in his torture†. He revelled in the suffering and tribulation he put on Lennie because he is enjoying bullying instead of being bullied himself. He also likes his new level as he can only do this to Lennie because he is not a threat and it is possibly the only time he can get his own back in some small way shape of form. Crooks’ character helps to widen the theme of loneliness in the novel because all the men on the ranch would have been proud and bitter men in someway because of the work they were forced to do. In addition, the way it says that it is unusual for people to travel around in twos I think that they were used to people keeping them selves to them because at the time it was written it was the great depression and so people were sad and tended not to communicate with other people. Crooks is given the smallest most desolate room on the ranch he is made to keep away from the bunkhouse where the rest of the workers work. His room is not only his room it is sort of an equipment store a place where equipment gets fixed. He is the also the only black person on the ranch and possibly the only black person for miles, which means that he has no one of his own race to converge with. The other thing that is not on his side is that with him being black no one would believe him if any thing went wrong an example of this is when Curleys wife goes into Crooks’ room and crooks tell her to leave she replies with that she calls him a nigger ands that she could get him lynched (hanged) quiet easily, implying that she doesn’t like him and that she could do it if she was pushed. The language used to describe Crooks gives him a lack of recognition which help the author to make the reader of the novel feel sorry for Crooks and that they would just want to help him. John Steinbeck uses this to show his lack of identity and thus making him an outsider to the rest of the people on the ranch who have a full explicit description of the way they look. The lack of description of crooks makes us feel sympathetic towards him Steinbeck also uses like a sad slow old-fashioned form of writing to make you feel like he is lonely and is sympathetic towards him. Crooks is quit an important character in the novel it helps the writer convey the loneliness and solitude there must have been being a worker on a desolate ranch. Crooks is also the only person in the novel who can take part in one of the novels main themes (discrimination). It is also a good way of letting you see what life was like and the way people strived to make their life long dream come true (the American dream). After a while Crooks begins to trust Lennie and they become friends, which is another (friendship).

Federalist Essay essays

Federalist Essay essays In order to protect the safety and welfare of this country, the states which it is comprised of must come together to form a unified society. History has indeed shown us that the unification of the people of America has enabled us to achieve our goals. Unfortunately at this time, in what hopes to be only a minor obstruction in this countys future, we once again find ourselves divided among causes. The Constitution has become an object of this great debate. To most, it is not a matter of the importance of government, but more a matter of the certain liberties that must be forfeited to create a national government. The union of this countrys 13 states holds the key to this newly forming nations vitality. The widely accepted Constitution holds a promise for the aforementioned vitality of this land. Initial efforts at unity were admirable, but at the same time were lacking. The Articles of Confederation never held any potential for this land. They were merely a starting ground that brought this country together enough to begin to form, as written in the preamble of the constitution, a more perfect union. The Constitution does exactly so, it creates a firm union of the people. As previously stated, a union in crucial to this country. With England and Spain feuding over the Mississippi and St. Lawrence Rivers, war could let loose. A unified nation is the best possible defense plan. By being able to reap the benefits of the brightest and most talented, by being able to enact foreign policy that treats all foreign threat the same, and by acting in the interests of this county as a whole, it becomes quite easy to ward of any threat to us. The Constitution lays out rules and guidelines for federal agencies (i.e. Congress, and The Supreme Court). A system was created that is fair for all states, which makes it fair for this country as a whole. Under the Constitution, there are ...

Huck essays

Huck essays Emotion, language, perception and reason are natural processes and in order to have a sense of self it is vital to be acquainted with the world. Epistemologies are essential to the development of schemas, concepts and bias that establish self. Without metaphysical curiosity and collective knowledge one is unable to acquire universal and self-knowledge. In the picaresque novel; The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain the mystifying Mississippi River provides its travelers with collective knowledge and persuades them to explore humanity. Huck, the cynical protagonist is exposed to untainted life and the hypocrisy of civilized society, as he travels down the murky river. Much like the Mississippi River, Huck is in flux, as he is prepared and often forced to modify his attitudes about humanity without endorsement. Mark Twain has made use of the episodic setting of the river, as well as the emerging action to illustrate the significant meaning of the novel. Through the reciprocal action and reaction of setting, Twain portrays Hucks moral evolution. Initially the Mississippi River is the ultimate symbol of freedom from hypocrisy and injustice of society to young Huck, who has yet to develop a personal concept of right and wrong. Throughout the novel Huck is willing to come to his own conclusions about important matters, even if these contradict societys norms. Yet at this point in the novel he is still a boy and is still influenced by others, especially his friend Tom, who obtains an obstinate reliance on romance novels and the authorities, which often results in egotistical acts of stupidity. In chapter ten, Huck demonstrates a similar act of idiocy by placing a dead rattlesnake near Jims sleeping place and causing the dead snakes mate to bit the runaway slave. The incident is not only a representation of Hucks childish stupidity, but is a biblical image of the Garden of Eden, where snakes lurk on an ...

The world of Sports matematics Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

The world of Sports matematics - Research Paper Example Just to mention but a few, in crickets, it serves to establish the number of runs and to enumerate the total number of runs needed in each over, what is referred to as the run rate. This is critical in beating the opponent. The discipline also serves in majoring the courtyards in football and to mark the perimeter from say the mount all through to home plate in baseball. The field is often 100 yards long and so it is marked at an interval of 10 yards using a line. This brings about the center being 50 yards from either side and divides the two teams halfway apart. In athletics otherwise referred to as sprints, mathematics is used to determine the speed of an individual relative to the opposition’s. This is achieved by determining two variables, which are the distance covered and the stride frequency. An interesting mathematical concept is involved in interpreting the speeds of any given athlete. To ascertain the technique best suits a sprinter in so far as take off is concerned, the athlete’s tangential slope is used to gauge his or her velocity. The results are then exposed to three modus operandi. In order to establish who among the players is best based on performance and contribution of the match, mathematical concepts still set in. The number of passes he or she receives and the number of complete passes he makes are translated into numbers, counted and used to determine their performance throughout the season. Baseball for instance derives its popularity from statistics which was used to keep records and tracks from home runs. The major operations such as subtraction, division, addition and multiplication have been used to bring fourth analysis and rational judgments in matters of sports. In football for example, there must be designated teams according to each pool and all these have to battle it out in order to secure a place on top of the pool. This in essence calls for counting of the number of goals scored, the

Writing assignment Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 2

Writing assignment - Research Paper Example It has often been said that the best way to end up with the worst people in your firm or business is to announce that the firm is laying off people. This ensures that the best people make an exit for the door and as Pfeffer points out, many firms rehire them simply because they cannot afford to lose those people. This is the morale factor. However, there are other factors as well which include the effect on a firm’s profitability (not profits) and its attitude towards its customers (particularly for service sector companies). All these factors make laying off people not that much of an attractive proposition and as Pfeffer points out, there might be other ways to beat the downturn apart from laying off people. Given the fact that the article was written in 2010 (at the peak of the Great Recession), there are some points in the article and Pfeffer’s recommendations that can be implemented by the firms and businesses. However, this is not to say that the entire set of recommendations are realistic when one takes into account the fact that many firms, in order to simply survive in the current economic climate need to cut jobs. The reason for downsizing becoming attractive is that the share of the service sector in the overall economy has gone up drastically in the last few decades. Since the service sector primarily relies on people and the costs of payroll and perks are the major chunk of the overall costs, there is indeed a case to be made for layoffs. Though as Pfeffer says when people are our main assets, why lose them. The point here is that one needs to take a nuanced approach towards Pfeffer’s recommendations and take those among them that make business sense. Without re sorting to emotional factors, Pfeffer has convincingly shown that layoffs do not make business sense as well. Maybe it is time for firms to look at financial optimization